Minor Rapists & Consensual Sex With Minor Girls

How do we treat juvenile rapists, has become a big question in front of us! One faction says with rape the juvenility of rapist cease to exist. A juvenile who is capable to penetrate has crossed the boundaries of childhood and has matured into an adult. Thus, a juvenile who rapes must be treated as an adult criminal.

Here, what we are doing is; we are defining the parameter of maturity on capability of erection and penetration rather than age. We must answer this question before we proceed to uphold this view. That is, what would we do if extremely minor child (rarest of rare case) who has become sexually capable to penetrate forms a part of gang which raped a woman, say a child of ten or twelve years old? Anatomically, it is possible for such minors to get erections required for penetrations.

Suppose, if age to be dealt as adult in crime as of rape is decreased to sixteen from eighteen, what would be the scenario if fifteen or fourteen years old boy becomes an accused in future gang rapes?

Thus, mere capability to penetrate would be ambiguous and vary with accused to accused and we will fail to mark a specific boundary line, only age factor can do the job properly. There are some limitations of law and such case could fit into limitations of it.

Another point is that whether the juvenile rapist committed the rape all alone, were planning or intention and force is involved; or formed a part of gang in which other adult accused were involved. And they were these adult rapists who allured (pleasure or proof of manhood etc) the juvenile to join them as co-criminal is a big question, in this scenario, what should we say, was the co-criminal juvenile mentally fit enough to comprehend the action and its consequence on his and victim’s life?

Another issue is that there are ample cases of men who fall in love with under-eighteen girls, they have consensual sexual relations. Indian laws states even consensual sexual relation with an under eighteen girl is kidnapping and rape. Numerous men are accused in such criminal cases where they had consensual sexual relations with under-eighteen girls only to be held accused of rape later on.

Here, there is a double standard in our outlook. When an under-eighteen boy rapes a woman, a lot of voices in India ask to treat him as an adult, reason for the same being he is mentally capable enough to comprehend what he is doing. But, when same age under eighteen girls has consensual sexual relations with a man, that man is a rapist in eyes of Indian laws.

Here, isn’t the girl too mentally capable enough to comprehend what she is doing? Then why should we hold her partner as rapist? Our Constitution asks us not to discriminate on grounds of gender as well, isn’t this discrimination purely on grounds of gender?

I do not support rape or sexual offences on women or girls, in any manner, rape and sexual offenses are crimes from all angles. What I want to say is if a minor rapist should be treated as adult criminal, how can minor girl be considered as victims when she had consensual sexual relation with a man who is accused of rapes later on?

UPSC/CSAT ki Hindi Samasya ka samadhan

Mae CSAT ki Hindi /Angrezi samasya ko hal kiye jane ke liye ye sujhao dena chahta hu. Hindi madhyam ke chhatro ki samasya Angrezi nibandh (passage) aur anuchit anuwad hae, jo unhe samajhne me kathin pardhta hae.

UPSC ke pariksha patr taiyyar karne wale adhikari Angrezi nibandh (passage) chunte hae; aur wey ye bhi karte hae ke pehli pariksha patr Angrezi me taiyyar karte hae jiske baad uska anuwad Hindi me karte hae. Unhe iske ulat karna chahiye. Unhe parisksha patr pehle Hindi me taiyyar karna chahiye aur uske baad uska anuwaad Angrezi me karne chahiye, isse Hindi chhatro ki anuwad ki samasya aur sikayat dono samapt ho jayengi. Ye sambhawit si baat hae ke Hindi se Angrezi anuwad itna anuchit nahi hoga jitna Angrezi se Hindi anuwad anuchit hone ka dawa kiya gaya hae.

Angrezi nibandho (passages) ki samasya ke liye unhe ye karna chahiye ke unhe koi Hindi nibandh jaese ke Prem Chand ka koi nibandh ya koi aur Hindi nibandh chunna chahiye, aur uska anuwad Angrezi me karwa kar use pariksha patr me dalna chahiye, ye saral hoga, aesa karne se Angrezi Nibandho ka pariksha patr ke Hindi Anuwad bhi me mil jayega, jo pehle nahi hua karta tha. Isse Angrezi pariksha patr ka 100% Hindi anuwad uplabdh ho jayega, aur Hindi chhatro ki samasya ka samadhan bhi ho jayega.

Solution for UPSC/CSAT's Hindi Problem

I would like to suggest a solution which will end the Hindi/ English row in CSAT. The problem Hindi medium candidates are raising are improper translations and English passages, which they find difficult to understand.

What UPSC paper setters do is they get English passages for paper; also first they make paper in English and then translate it into Hindi. They should do the other way round. They should set the paper in Hindi and then translate it into English, this will end translation problem for Hindi candidates and will bring an end to their complaints. It is probable that Hindi to English translation will never be as improper or difficult as English to Hindi translation is claimed to be.

For English passages what they should do is they choose an Hindi passage say: from Prem Chand’s passages or any other Hindi passage, get it translated to English, which obviously would be less problematic, and put it into the paper, in this way even Hindi translation of passage would be available in Hindi version of question paper, which previously was never there, English passages used to be only in English. In this way we could have 100% Hindi version of English paper, no Hindi candidate would complaint.

UPSC/CSAT and politics of PM Modi's government

The problem which PM Narendra Modi’s government addressed is absurd; next, some people will say we don’t know proper agriculture and farming because we are urban so remove agricultural questions from UPSC paper.

The Hindi issue is actually brain child of people like Rajnath Singh, who are expert in playing language politics, now they themselves are in mess to solve the problem which is their very own creation.

Hindi cannot bridge the gap with South India, only English could bridge the gap between North and South India. No South Indians or other Non-Hindi speakers should suffer the Hindi imposition.

Narendra Modi, Rajnath Singh and their BJP/NDA government is supplying fuel to fire of language politics, slowly slowly they will cut tongues of South Indians with their Hindi scissors.

BJP/NDA will try clarify that Narendra Modi himself is a Gujarati speaker yet promotes Hindi for nationalist causes, this is wrong. Gujarati speakers easily understand Hindi, Gujarati and Hindi are mutually tangible so such claims in favour of Modi are blatant lies. Tamil for example is not as tangible with Hindi as Gujarati is.

Hindi is not bad and no language is bad, language politics is bad, and to impose one’s language on others is bad. South Indians and all Non-Hindi speakers should stand against this language politics.

However, I would like to suggest Govt. in the interest of UPSC candidates in another blog of mine:  
Solution for UPSC/CSAT’s Hindi problem
UPSC/ CSAT ki Hindi samasya ka samadhan

Euthanasia (Allowed To Die) In India

It is so sensitive issue that nothing would prevent it from being called an intended murder even if minor (micro, nano) error in medical or psychological understandings and considerations occur. A life thus ended could never be bought back, who would carry the responsibility of that minute error resulting in death of the concerned person?

In India, nothing would follow it but exhumation, autopsy and closed files, these would be more of indignity for the deceased. Who can deny the possibility of organ transplant scam in the name of euthanasia? This question if put in India would prove to be a direct disaster on the very first human right ‘life’. The very word ‘life’ would literally be euthanized in that debate in India.

India has retained its sovereignty even after so many years, what about our reach in the field of medical science and medical research after so many years of sovereignty? Is Sovereignty the only parameter required to take into consideration the issue of euthanasia in India?

Let’s analyse, how much India has contributed in the field of medical science, medical research, anatomy, surgery, drugs, psychology, since independence, since our sovereignty? With what maturity India stands in the world today in field of medical science and research? What is quota for medical science and research in our annual union budget 2014 and individual state budgets? Where does this quota stand in comparison to the quota allotted for medical field in countries where euthanasia is allowed?

People talk about right to die with dignity in India. Rather, the question should be whether prior to dying with dignity, was there anything about living with dignity in India? Millions and millions of Indians live below poverty line, under extreme poverty. Million of Indians starve to death, millions of Indians have no access to drinking water, and millions of Indians go without food on daily basis. Millions of infants die in a couple of year since birth; millions of mothers die of childbirths.

Millions of Indians are extremely malnourished. Millions of Indians die due to extreme weathers. Millions of Indians have no place to call home. Millions of Indians sleep under open sky on footpaths in the night. Millions of Indians live in most un-hygienic environment. Millions of Indians are exposed to deadly pollution; millions are exposed to various carcinogenic factors due to radiations, water, air and sound pollutions.

Millions of Indians don’t know how to read and write, millions of Indians toil all day, sweating under scorching sun to earn two loaves of breads. Millions of Indian and millions of Indian children beg on streets, they beg, beg and beg, they beg in front of European and American tourists, around a monument, any place where foreigners could be found.

Millions of Indian girls are forced into trafficking, into prostitution. Millions of Indians girls are raped, assaulted, molested, gang-raped. Millions are murdered or left to die of wounds and trauma. Due to trafficking and rapes, millions of Indian girls are exposed to deadly disease ‘AIDS’, they would obviously want to die with dignity what about the indignity they faced in life?

Millions of cognizable criminal cases go un-registered; even if they are bought to notice of Indian police. Murdered in the name of encounters by police is not a new thing to hear in India. Millions of Indians are decaying in Indian jails since years, years over years, because of slow judicial trials.

Millions of villages are without hospitals, electricity, elementary schools, and primary schools, forget about colleges and universities. Millions of Indians suffer due to absurd dictats of ‘Khap Panchayats’, millions of Indians are murdered in the name of ‘honour killings’. Millions of Indians die in rail accidents, many in road accidents due un-maintained roads and railways.

India is still under need of medical facilities, proper drug supply. Millions of Indian can’t afford life saving drugs because of costs. India is in dire need of hospitals. India has a terrific shortage of medical colleges, and trained doctors, on the other hands medical seats are sold. We have a lot of scams of fake medical degree being granted on payment. This is where we stand with our bejewelled intact crown of sovereignty.

If this is the situation after so many years of sovereignty, we must conclude that Indian governments in all forms have failed to serve our citizens.

Today, Indian first need, a right to live a life with dignity. A person, who has received death blows all his life due to various national systems and procedures, and due to inefficiency of governments in various stages of his life, would definitely ask for death with dignity. But this death with dignity is not because of love of evident death, but because of frustration of indignity of life the person has lived because of inefficiency of governments.

Who would answer if Indians are made to live with dignity, how many Indians would ask for a death with dignity (euthanasia). An irrevocable patient may have been irrevocable because lack of medical aid during his entire life, may be because of police inefficiency in saving his life, may be because the patient was raped and assaulted due to inefficient system. May be so because he received nothing but dates in legal struggle of his life, this 'may be' has no limits, but the reasons are our government, official and constitutional agencies in no matter what form. The system pushes the citizen where he begins to ask for death with dignity.

To conclude, we may be sovereign enough to legislate on the issue of Euthanasia in India, but our Parliament and State Assemblies are not mature enough to even comprehend the gravity of euthanasia. Today, if euthanasia is legalised in India, it would mean just an official genocide, genocide of poor, genocide of unfortunate Indians who never ever practically tasted or experienced the fruits of our Constitution.

I salute Supreme Court's verdict on Shariat Court

Hon. Supreme Court today gave verdict regarding Darul Qad'at or Darul Itfa or Shariat courts. It is an awesome judgement.

There can never be a parallel judiciary in a country like India, and Mufti as they are called have no official rights to give binding judgement on almost everything. Most of the time their fatwe are so stupid (ie: UP rape case) that these Mufti should be bought in court for defamation suits against them.

I salute the Hon. Supreme Court's for this judgement that Shariat Court is not a legal identity or parallel judiciary in India. That Mufti should not give fatwa to the third party who dont seek their fatwa. And that a Fatwa is not binding upon anyone its a mere opinion in India. If need arise Hon. Supreme Court too can take Holy Qur'an into consideration where need arise, and I am petty sure that consideration would be much better than these Mufti.

I look forward that this judgement would change ground reality and would result in positive outlook and positive change for crores of Muslims in India.

Authoritarian aims of Narendra Modi

It is so simple to understand PM Narendra Modi wants to rule in an authoritarian manner. The way he isolated all senior BJP leaders on pretext of age was a glimpse.

Now, he's with lame excuses trying best not to appoint Leader of Opposition, Narendra Modi talks about clarity and he himself want that post which is core of clarity not to be appointed, its an irony. Only that person who wants to be authoritarian would behave as he's doing.

Our Speaker (Who should be very neutral) if she wants a just government she should instantly appoint Leader of opposition. Our times are different from Nehru era, we are largest democracy which requires LOP. Even if one MP from Lok Sabha forms opposition and all others are from ruling party, that one person should be instantly appointed as LOP. Even if all members are from ruling party an LOP should be appointed in Lok Sabha.

Having no LOP in Lok Sabha is harmful to our democratic make-up, if Narendra Modi's government is so clean and clear then why to fear appointment of LOP? Things are fishy and the solution is appointment of LOP in Lok Sabha.

Irresponsible Election Commission Of India

Election Commission of India is responsible for conducting free and fair election in India. Adult Franchisee, Universal Suffrage is recognised and all people above 18 years of age can cast their vote. Is it a reality in India?

Parliamentary election 2014 is under process and it’s sad to know how irresponsible and inefficient our Election Commission is, in conducting free and fair election. It is duty of Commission to update voter's list. It has five year’s slot to update voter's list, this commission runs under so called capable guidance of Mr V S Sampath Election Commissioner; could not even get passing grade from practical point of view, why so it’s as follow:

1) People who voted during the last election don’t find their names in voter's list and could not vote for Parliamentary Election, though they have Election Card, they were not allowed to vote. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India is this free and fair election?

2) There is just no co-ordinance between Election Commission of India and Municipalities, dead people are on current voter list, while many eligible living people are barred from voting which is their right, Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you have such sound mind that you expect dead to come out of graves to cast their votes?

3) Our Election Commission has ashamed even Kumbh Karan ( A demon in Epic Ramayana, who sleeps for six months), Commission sleeps for 4 years and six month and awakes six months prior to election and ask people who crossed 18 years to enlist themselves to voter's list, the process and executives are lethargic of highest grade. Majority of people who crossed 18 years could not enlist themselves for some or other technical reasons. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner is this free and fair election?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, do you think this way your leadership will pave way for our democratic government? Do you feel the government forming after declaration of results would be free, fair and justly elected government?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commisioner of India, what answers do you have for those voters who had cast their vote in last election and where not finding their names in your so called current voter's list and thus barred from voting?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, clarify what kind of computerisation and collaborations you have with municipalities that people who are long dead are invited by you to vote?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, we are a democracy it is when each and every eligible person voluntarily cast vote could we call it a democracy, people were heart broken when under your leadership they were barred from voting. When a large number of eligible people are barred from voting it’s not democracy it’s Oligocracy.

If Government changes a lot of people would smell a rat in the process, some alternate form of Gerrymandering, this time not with constituencies but with voter’s list, to isolate potential supporters of particular party from voting thus to influence the result. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you have answers ready when possibly Media ask you this question?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, we know you’ll say it’s a hectic job to conduct election and some mishap occurs. But that is exactly what your job is all about, that is exactly you get hectic pay through public exchequer, has your pay or any of commission’s executives’ pay missed from exchequer’s list? If no than why voter’s names were missing? You’re Election Commissioner of India (1200000000 people country) and you are paid as per that, you are not election commissioner of San Marino or Luxembourg (minimal population).

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you take responsibility for such occurrence where voter’s name were missing and thus barred from voting? What remedial measure you have for those who were barred from voting? How would you compensate the loss of their say (vote) in formation of government?

I would say, just as yours and your executives’ names never goes missing from exchequer’s list and as you take full pay give your full output, full output that you reach even the last eligible voter, else it’s never democracy, secondly you are put up at the position exactly for that; to conduct election in 120 crore people country.

As you say of computerisation prove it practically and collaborate with municipalities to remove names of dead people. Find death rate of India, and assure that that many number of people are removed from voter’s list. Find maturity rate of India and assure that that many new voter are enlisted, keep the voter’s list updated, that your primary job.

Don’t become active just six months prior to election, work for whole five years and practically prove it.

Do something for those who missed their right to vote; because without them no matter whichever government is formed that is not democratic, it would be oligocratic. Constitution defines India as a Democracy and not as Oligocracy.

Mr. V S Sampath your leadership has mocked our democracy and whole world know it.

Muslim Clerics, BJP and Indian Muslim Personal Law

Some of Shia and Sunni clerics are openly supporting BJP and its PM candidate Narendra Modi. The double standard of these Shia and Sunni clerics is worth to note.

Most of these Shia and Sunni clerics have seats and memberships of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, and they exercise all due privilages. Being members of All India Muslim Personal Law Board they are clearly in favour of Muslim Personal Law in India.

Also, BJP manifesto clearly states that when it comes to power and makes Narendra Modi the PM, they will abolish religious personal laws and thereby bring Uniform Civil Code.

If these Muslim Clerics are members of All India Muslim Personal Law Board which is based on the very principal of religious personal laws, then, how can these Muslim Clerics being a member of the board openly support BJP which clearly states in its manifesto that it will abolish personal laws to bring in Uniform Civil Code?

Muslims in India regardless of Shia and Sunni should first asks these clerics who support BJP to first resign from the post and membership of All India Muslim Personal Law Board and then and only then begin their support for BJP which is pro Uniform Civil Code.

A simple question for such double standard Shia and Sunni clerics of India, why are they trying to fool Indian Muslims in return of what so ever personal favours from BJP.

Congress (UPA) for India, 2014

State of United Nations: Crimea as 'The State of United Nations'

State of United Nations: Crimea as 'The State of United Nations': I wondered about the possibility, that if Crimea had rather become the location for ‘The State of United Nations’

India Of My Dreams: Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians

India Of My Dreams: Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians: Every Indian knows very well how rich our politicians the representatives and ministers are, nothing less than billionaires. Most of these...

India Of My Dreams: Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima

India Of My Dreams: Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima: Har Bharat wasi ye both acchi tarike se jaanta hai ke hamare neta, hamare jan partinidhi aur mantri kitne amir hote hae, abjopati karodopa...

India Of My Dreams: Youths in Indian Parliament and Assemblies

India Of My Dreams: Youths in Indian Parliament and AssembliesWhen we ...: Youths in Indian Parliament and Assemblies When we take an overview of members of Indian Parliament and assemblies, we can conclude that...

India Of My Dreams: Bhartiya Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawan

India Of My Dreams: Bhartiya Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawan: Hindi Agar hum Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao ko dhyan se dekhe to hum ye keh sakte hae ke Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhaye buddho ...

Suspended Kashmiri Students, Meerut

Our Indian law is so concerned about education that even criminals who are serving their sentences in jails are allowed to pursue education and acquire degrees and diplomas from jail itself. A lot of criminals serving in jail have completed their education and acquired degrees being in jail. Now, 67 Kashmiri students who cheered for Pakistani cricket team against Indian cricket team have been suspended from university in Meerut and charges of sedition have been imposed on them. On what ground vice-chancellor, warden etc suspended the accused and blocked their education, when even criminals in jail are allowed to study?

Which Indian act or law empowers the chancellor, vice-chancellor, and warden etc of a university to snatch away right to education from accused while even criminal in jails are allowed to pursue education? Are these authorities of university competent enough to deal in such offenses? Should it be our Parliament, legislative bodies and Courts to decide what is anti-nationalism and which accused is traitor; or chancellors of universities and schools can decide it? Vice-chancellor, warden said its anti-nationalism and the accused are traitor, now, which law, act and code they based their judgement which defines ‘cheering for a sports team in a match which is playing (I repeat playing) against national team be taken as yard-stick or acid test for treason?

If that view point is sensible then, when we call Pakistanis to watch a match in India, and when they cheer for Pakistan, aren’t we arranging treason on Indian soil against India as per the above logic, that too in guise of sports? Sports matches and support for a team possibly might be because the person judges the team mates of that team as competitive. If someone cheers for Indian team in Pakistan would the vice-chancellor, warden also term that as treason against Pakistan and the accused liable for penalty. If someone says ‘yes’, then in my opinion it is better to stop this shop (business) called sports which is ultimately taken as so sensitive matter ‘treason’. If it is treason then where the hell sports and joy would go?

Is it obligatory by Indian law, any act or code of it, or is it fundamental duty that Indians should only support Indian cricket team in matches, and it is a crime to cheer against Indian team?

Repercussions are that Pakistan has mocked us by inviting the suspended cheerers (mere cheerers) to pursue education in Pakistan. To deprive someone of education on such ground is not in coherence with Indian laws. And only competent authorities have right to define what constitute treason not petty vice-chancellors and wardens.

‘India and Pakistan’ and ‘Indian Cricket Team and Pakistani Cricket Team’ are two different subjects. Sports may be a part of patriotism but cannot be a yardstick or acid test of patriotism. Players individual sportsmanship or fan following should not be taken for judgement. Many Pakistanis would have loved the style of Sachin Tendulkar and would have loved to see him make centuries, does that meant they were anti-Pakistani?

Many Pakistani patients come for treatment and surgeries to India; does that mean India is supporting treason against Pakistan? Or does it mean the patients are Anti-pakistanis? What students did appeared absurd but if that causes problem it was better to prohibit watching tv matches in premises of university and not taking such stern actions. Our Indian Constitution asks us to rise above narrow outlook and broaden it.

Election Commission, Kejriwal & Indian Flag

These days Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is staging various protests at various cities. Aam Aadmi Party under ignorance (guidance) of Arvind Kejriwal is staging protest at offices of various political parties has crossed it to violence. Havoc (discipline) of Aam Aadmi Party is actually the internal commotion where each AAP member (i.e. Ashutosh) wants to project himself as parallel Arvind Kejriwal, having a similar cadre. This is because they know if so called common man Arvind Kejriwal can achieve fame through propaganda they too should give it a try for themselves.

Election Commission of India should take notice of AAP’s misuse and mishandling of Indian National Flag in its road shows. Does our flag code allow it to be used as party flag in its various rallies and waved haphazardly? Election Commission should take notice of how AAP members are using National Flag as their party banner. AAP members are using broom their election symbol at equal height and on par with Indian National Flag which is extremely derogatory.

Congress, Nationalist Congress, BJP, Samajwadi, Shiv Sena, Trinamool, BSP, Communist and all other parties use their party flag. Only this AAP is using (misusing) our national flag in their violent protests. Thus, Election Commission of India should warn Aam Aadmi Party from using Indian National flag as their private property, using it as and how they want to.

Aam Aadmi Party is dishonouring our National Flag which is against the fundamental duty of citizens as per our Constitution. Thus, Election Commission should take strict and stern action against Aam Aadmi Party and its ‘Yeda’ leader Arvind Kejriwal, and prevent National Flag’s further misuse.

India Of My Dreams: A plea to Bombay High Court on footpath parkingHer...

India Of My Dreams: A plea to Bombay High Court on footpath parkingHer...: A plea to Bombay High Court on footpath parking Hereby, through this post of mine of my blog, I appeal and pray to the Honourable Bombay...

India Of My Dreams: The stupidity of intra-city long bridges

India Of My Dreams: The stupidity of intra-city long bridges: We have been trying to combat traffic jams but are a failure, which implies our methods to control the traffic are absurd. Thus we need to...

Gantantra Diwas Ki Parade aur uska Kharch

Gantantra Diwas ki Parade aur uska Kharch

Agar hum Bharatiya Gantantra diwas ki parade ke viprit kuch bhi kehte hae, jisme achi khasi raqam kharch hoti hae jiska janta par bojh padta hae, hume kaha jata hae hum shradha nahi rakhte. Bharat ki sena ke balidano ke prati shadha nahi hae. Ye bilkul ghalat arop hae. Koi bhi aesa nahi hoga jo sena ke balidano ke prati shradha nahi rakhta hoga.

Balke, jab hum adhik kharcha karke is parade ka ayojan karte hae us samay hum unlogo ke prati sharadha nahi rakhte hae jinhe us pal zarurat hoti hae roti ki, dawao ki, haspatalo ki aur zaruri suwidhao ki sath hi zarurat hae infra-structure ki. Balke jab hum Bharat ke Sanvidhan ke margdarshan se hat jate hae us samay hume shardha nahi hoti.

Samvidhan ka mardarshan hume aage badhne ko prerit karta hae, is liye to sanvidhan ko nahi lagu kiya gaya tha taake parade par karodo kharch ho. Ye adhik acha hota ke hum apne desh ko uphar dete Gantanra Diwas ka hospatalo ke rup me, sadko ke rup me, bijli gharo ke rup me.

Gantantra diwas Sanvidhan ka diwas hae naake sirf sena ka, adhik dhyan hamare sanvidhani marg par dena chaiye.

Gantantra Diwas ki Shubkamnaye.

Indian Republic Day Parade and its expenses

If we Indians says anything against costly Republic day Parade, in which a hefty amount is burdened on public, we are labelled as insensitive. Insentivie towards the sacrifice of our soldiers. This is absolutely an absurd remark. No one is insensitive towards the sacrifices of our soldiers.

Rather, when we lavishly celebrate such occassion we are being insensitive to a lot of Indians who are in dire need of bread, medicines, hospitals, schools. Beyond that we are in dire need of infra-structure. Our efforts in providing necessary facilities and necessary infra-structure, would rather be being sensitive towards our goals as stated in Contitution of India.

Consitution wants us to go further in our goal, it was not adopted on 26 January so that we go on spending crores on parades. It would really be a better way to celebrate our republic day by giving our country gifts on republic day in form of hospitals, roads, power generation houses etc.

Republic day is day for Constitution and not solely about defense, we should concentrate more on our goals on this day.

Happy Republic Day.

Innovative Mazher: Control mosquitoes with 'Brecomb'

Innovative Mazher: Control mosquitoes with 'Brecomb': I was pondering over mosquito menace, and struck upon this new technique to control mosquito menace and make our environment more disease f...