Shameless Anna!

As his craze has vanished away atleast now he should understand he is not a public representative forget about being modern Gandhi. A voilent villager self proclaimed national leader should now take some lessons, people have started to understand his hidden motives and many have left his stupid campaign. Parliament showed up yesterday that the real representative of Indian people is Parliament, and the real legislative power rests in the hands of parliament. Anna sensing that his hidden motives are becoming evident day by day coined another stupid term Jan Lok Sabha ( Those who gather up in his campaign) he claimed his Jan Lok Sabha is above Lok Sabha. I can't understand what kind of mentality he has, and how moron are his supporters.

He is really shameless, why I called him shameless is because when a person on chair requests him something in the name of chair, the position needs to be respested. PM, CM and various ministers and MPs have requested him to end his campaign, he denied them ridiculing them, its not the person who he degraded but the position from where they requested him. This itself shows what respect he has for democracy. He talks about sacrifices of freedom fighters, he should know that the said freedom fighters sacrificed exactly for the same democracy that he is ridiculing now.

It was really funny when Mr. Laloo talked about establishing All India Anna Health Organisation. I think Anna should be booked under contempt of Constitution and Parliament. If this could not be done atleast he should be declared mentally unfit and be reffered to psychiatrist on Govt's expenses. As for his joker team Kiran and Arvind they are seriously gone cases nothing could be done, they are dipped in corruption yet claim themselves infallible. If they really want to prove themselves they should contest election and become public representative themselves or get them nominated either. Until then they should not cross their limits. Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) is Supreme, Anna's Jan Lok Sabha is ridiculous.

Best Wishes on occasion of Christmas

Best wishes on occasion of Christmas and the coming new year 2012, may God bless us with His Blessings.

Gist of 6th Majlis by Maulana Mohammed At’har

 

Gist of 4rd in series of topic, 6th Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At’har, 1 Dec, Moharram 2011, Masjid Iraniyan, Bombay, India

Topic: Injustice done to Prophet (saw) and his ancestors as well as progeny by biased Islamic history

Today, I would like to have a reply from them who want the matter to be forgotten, that as to why shouldn’t we analyse the events in light of evidence and conscience? When ever, something is spoken, they get objected to our views and opinion on grounds of so called authentic hadith. Look, it is written in so and so book, how can you have a contrary opinion? Well, it should be asked from them, for you who is more important? Who do you love more, Prophet (saw) or these so called narrators?

In their opinion Prophet (saw) was bestowed prophet hood after 40 years. We believe him to be prophet throughout his life from start to the end. Well, let them believe what they have to, but can they answer that up to these 40 years, what was the status of Prophet (saw)? Since, if he was not a prophet for 40 year what was he an ummati (follower of prophet) or a prophet himself? If he was ummati and later became prophet, isn’t it stupid to think that he was lower in status to someone else since he was the other person’s ummati and all of sudden became greater than the person to whom he was ummati, because we all know Prophet (saw) is higher than any other prophet (as). Thus, we can’t have such shaggy belief as they have.

What we have to say about his first 40 years is that in that time as well he was a prophet. But his job was not to reveal the scripture or bring new canon to an uncultured people of Hijaz (his county). It was necessary that first the characters of these people be raised to comprehend the canon and then the revelation be bought. Just like to sow the seed, the farms have to be tilled and fertilized. Prophet (saw) for 40 years gave them characters, the people who had no virtue began to realize the virtue of sadaqat (truth) and amanat (trust) in Prophet (saw), that’s why they gave him title of Sadiq (Truthful) and Amin (Trustful).

These so called muhadditean (narrators) have bought so much ignorance in minds of muslims that it needs to be checked, else, it harms the faith. They wrote when Mohammed (saw) was in Hira (famous cave) he saw a spirit he got frightened he came trembling to his wife, she wrapped him in blankets. Later, she went to Waraqa (her cousin, a scholar in Bible), Waraqa told her: ask Mohammed (saw) not to get frightened as the spirit which came to him was Gabriel, who in aforetime had came to Moses (as) as well, he will soon become a prophet. So she came and asked him what her cousin had spoken to her, she later asked him to go there once again in the cave. So he went this time Gabriel, pressed him, took out his heart, slit it, took out something and threw that away washed the heart and later put something in his heart and then placed it in chest and closed the slit. How stupid are these whims and fancies of so called narrators. In today’s world we all know the position of heart in human body; it does just the job of pumping blood. All feelings, desires, good and bad action that we do take place first in our brain, so in modern day we know brain and not heart is centre of activities. This Mohaddith was ignorant about anatomy to he wrote as he thought, he wrote heart was cleansed, how could heart be cleaned when views and actions have their centres in the brain? This itself shows, the so called authentic hadith are baseless.

Points to be noted here is that see how favours and certifications of Christianity and Judaism are imposed on Prophet (saw)! We, also don’t believe him to have got frightened when Gabriel appeared to him, when his deputy (Ali (as)) didn’t got frightened with python in childhood, it is so stupid to think Prophet (saw) getting scared. Also, on one occasion they accuse Prophet (saw) is illiterate on second they say Gabriel asked Prophet (saw) to read, how can an illiterate person be asked to read, it is so stupid to think so. They and not we have such baseless belief that Prophet (saw) was illiterate.

Why did Prophet (saw) come to Makka (Hijaz) as these places were almost uncivilized? Why didn’t Prophet (saw) appear in Egypt, India, Greece, Mesopotamia (Iraq) as these were centres of civilization. Well, suppose if am asked to deliver a lecture to a decent public, I will very well do that, but if am asked to deliver a lecture at some place. I go there on the podium and then had a look, those people in audience had stones in their hand, children were doing mischief in the right side and few insane people were sitting on the right side, I would definitely get down and won’t give lecture. Why?

If I get praises from decent audience that is greatness of the content of lecture. But If I give lecture to the above discussed people who had stones in their hand and they praise me and get very engrossed in the lecture, that is definitely the greatness of my character, same happened with Prophet (saw), had he appeared in civilized society that there was nothing great because people were already civilized, Prophet (saw) appearing in Makka, cradle of ignorance and then making them civilized was his personal greatness.

Certain events are attributed to Prophet (saw) that we can never accept, our conscience never accepts those stupid things. One event is Prophet (saw) came for prayers in mid of it got away and later again came back, people asked him, what had happened? He replied: I had forgotten to do ablution. How can a Prophet (saw) forget? If he can than people would definitely ask what kind of prophet is he?

If we object these so called stuff these people say: why you check, what is the necessity? Well, I would like to ask them don’t you check notes (1000 Rs, 500 Rs)? Don’t you have faith in your friend or boss or anyone who gave it to you, what would you say if he objects at your checking? You would say don’t feel bad but there are duplicate notes in circulation. So shouldn’t we also ask these people are there unauthentic hadith in circulation as well? So let us check, don’t object.

Govt. too had made available machines which separate duplicate notes from real one. Did God also give us machine to separate fake hadith from real one? Yes, we have Quran. Checks with it, the hadith which confirms with Quran are authentic while those which have contrary content are faulty.

It is just like someone presenting you 1000 glasses of colddrink, and says to you just one glass has potassium cyanide in it, the possibility is 1 in 1000 so don’t fear have a glass of colddrink, you will never do that, so also, is the case with hadith.

My appeal is not with Muslim ulema (scholars) today but with Muslim Ummah (Muslimdom), that they have a look on these issues which defames the characters of Prophet (saw) and his family and delete these fake hadith.

Husain (as) gave us true identity of Islam, yet they accuse: what was the use of Karbala, people are still doing evil things. Well don’t have such opinions because in that case it can create a more troublesome questions, so many prophets (as) came did the world got a better place? Religion has its own policy. Allah doesn’t want people to believe in him out of force or do actions under force or compulsion. Had it been so Allah would have given headaches to people and that would go away the moment a person offers namaz, no one will ever leave namaz. Allah can give people stomach ache if they don’t fast, all will begin to fast. But Allah doesn’t want anyone to perform his religious duty under force.

 

Anna, Opposition, Janlok Pal and Walmart

Hi,

Foremost, I would like to welcome Walmart to India, now products in India would tranform into world class.

Anna and his stupid team have started funny stuffs once again, same janlok pal issue, now he says: Government double crossed. How funny! govt. had a job to take the bill in parliament, now if parliament and its true representatives of people of India have thought otherwise that of Anna, what is the fault of govt? Anna want his whims and fancies should be taken by MPs as kings order, he wants them to go as and how he thinks, how funny!
He said he is just opposed to govt on janlokpal issue, if that is resolved he would go and help Congress led govt. in its working, I wondered now where this opposition with regards to Walmart of Anna comes from? Implies he wants to gain power in political aspects. Why doesn't he join mainstream politics if he has so many important issue in the interests of public? He knows he would loose on that stage, so just to create a gimmick which can't be checked about his political value he avoid mainstream politics, and declares he is very much inseperable part of Politics (Policy making) in India.
Opposition, has a job to oppose govt. that is very much legal. everyone wants to remain in power, they are more considerate about opposing govt. so they can pave way for their own position in the next tenure. They are not very much considerate about development, its very much understood, just oppose the govt. is the motto of opposition, but this is valid and legal. Why is Anna jumping in, poking his nose in middle of something which he has no idea about? Playing opposition on one occasion and declaring he is very crystal clear and neutral at the same time.

I have this thing to say, I am happy that Walmart came to India! It would create a lot of job vacancies for Indians, and is in interest of country. Anna, you better take some B complex vitamin supplement and rest as well.

Gist of 5th Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At'har

 

Gist of 3rd in series of topic, 5th Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At’har, 30 Nov, Moharram 2011, Masjid Iraniyan, Bombay, India

Topic: Injustice done to Prophet (saw) and his ancestors as well as progeny by biased Islamic history

Yesterday, I discussed about Ali (as) declaring that he gained knowledge from Prophet (saw). People may argue at one point you say Allah taught Ali (as) at other occasion you claim Prophet (saw) gave him knowledge just like birds feed their young ones in nest.

Well, the confusion should be cleared about who actually gave him the knowledge. First, I would like to inform that knowledge has three types:

1)      Knowledge of all sciences and languages (everything that could be questioned about)

2)      Knowledge of seen and unseen, past present and future (as and when they need)

3)      Knowledge of Marifat Ilahi (Connection with God)

The third category has no limits; if ever it had limits it would limit the prestige and power of God, which is in real limitless itself. It is the third kind of knowledge that Ali (as) declared he learnt from Prophet (saw). It was this ilm (knowledge) that Prophet (saw) talked about when he asked Rabbi zidni ilma ( O Lord advance me in my knowledge), since it is limitless knowledge.

I would like to question them that what they think Prophet (saw) came for to distribute Quran of to teach Quran? I was asked to distribute few Gujarati books while I was off to Gujarat, I did exactly that, since I don’t know Gujarati I had nothing to do with what was written in those book, my job was only to distribute. But suppose if am asked to teach a few books at a college, do I need to know about those books or not? Prophet (saw) came to teach Quran, Quran declares knowledge of everything is in this book, if book contains all knowledge and Prophet (saw) came to teach, how can we believe he was illiterate? They accuse us that we believe our Imams (as) have complete knowledge of book. Well, after Prophet (saw) if no one has complete knowledge of book, what is the use of such a knowledge which came for the time being and went away with Prophet (saw)? Off course, Quran says: O Prophet (saw), We are witness over you and He who has complete knowledge of Book. Implies there was someone who had complete knowledge of book, we believe him to be Ali (as). They further accuse us, how do you know? Well, bring any other person who declared Saloni Saloni (ask me, ask me) whatever you would like to ask before I am gone. They could never bring anyone; others themselves came to Ali (as) for their questions. It was Ali (as) who declared: Ask me anything before am gone, ask me the route to skies, today people are doing research about how to reach in various outer space’s locations.

Jahal (ignorance) and ilm (knowledge) are two opposites, whatever good ever happened or is happening or will happen is because of knowledge, and all troubles and vices are because of ignorance. The progress is due to knowledge, troubles are due to ignorance. Thus we say when it is silent it is Quran, when it speaks it is Ali (as)! The people who disagreed and fought with Ali (as) were actually fighting knowledge due to their ignorance! Ali (as) was fountain of knowledge and how stupid they were when fountain itself came to thirsty, these people in their hatred for knowledge out of their ignorance left the sides of Ali (as). Ali (as) made dams in Euprates, and claimed if he wishes he could illuminate the cities with these water falling from dam, it is today that we make hydroelectricity after 1400 years.

It is shame, that these aalims claim themselves aalim by declaring their own Prophet (saw) illiterate! They would say, see its written in so and so authentic book, well, who do you love more, Prophet (saw) or these narrators who wrote the book? Don’t these people have sense!

Ismat (infallibility), we credit out Imams (as) with it. Prophet (saw) and all Imams (as) have Ismat. Prophet brings Shariyat (canon) and it is Imam who interprets it but according to wishes of Allah and not on his own wishes. Can you memorise a mere directory, no, not even a single talk or debate word to word. This is exactly where problem creeps in thus we need infallible person, then and only then can there be no scope for error. It is gigantic task in itself to be perfect about a teaching which itself took 23 years to take its form. Am having a talk with you today can you memorise it word for word tomorrow? No one, I am sure of that. But if someone records it, it can be available word for word. What if the recorder is a young man, do old people have any doubt about record, exactly this happened. The older ones got angry that a young man was given the task of interpretation. What if number of copies of records is made one after the other would there be any change in the message? No, this is exact case of series of Imams (as).

Ismat is not a prestige issue, rather is it much more a necessity for the religion. In the other way round it must be clear that where the error took place, if it can’t be located and one is sure error did took place, the whole process would became faulty. Thus either the error must be located or infallibility be accorded, if ever religion is believed to be correct.

Another accusation is Prophet (saw) was mortal and like use. We believe he was Noor (Spiritual illuminance). A mere mortal can’t bear the weight of spiritual (hidden) aspects of Quran. They would further argue why he came in image of man? Well, Allah says: la ikraha fid diin (there is no compulsion in religion), Allah doesn’t want people to recite declaration of faith out of force. Had he come in his Noor personality people would have become muslim out in fear. Thus Allah gave him two aspects one which was Noor other which was bashar (normal human being). Prophet (saw) is taken as witness for Adam (as), how can he be witness when he was not even born, implies his Noor was always there.

Today when reciting majlis am here, I am sure thousands of TV are watched around world, it is magnificence of electronic waves. We know material can’t be at two places on same occasion, but look electronic waves take my influence to so many places at the same time. Exactly this is the issue when we call Ya Mohammed (saw) and Ya Ali (as) and so on.

If someone disrespects Quran, won’t muslims get angry? Sure, but if someone is disrespecting Quran in this world what harm he does to celestial Quran which is written on Arsh (Celestial apex). Implies disrespect to any form is a real disrespect and thus there can be two aspects of same source or personality.

So called Mulla (priests) accuse us. These people (Shia) take Ali (as) as god beside Allah. Disgusting! When we celebrate 13^th rajab as birthday of Ali (as) or when we mourn 21^st Ramadan as martyrdom of Ali (as) these very people accuse us of bidah (innovation) and kufr (disbelief), stupid people, rather than kufr and bidah it is tauhid (monotheism). When we celebrate birth and mourn death we declare we don’t take Ali (as) as god, when we refer Ali (as) to be son of Abu Talib (as), Husnain (as) to be sons of Ali (as), we declare we don’t take Ali (as) as god, Quran itself says: He (God) has neither son nor is He a son! He has neither wives nor childrens, neither born nor dies.

Finally, to end the majlis it is clear these so called religious authorities had no respect for Prophet (saw).

Janabe Zohair (as) and Habib ibn Mazahir (as), actions of both of them in service of Imam Husain (as) at Karbala were briefed up as the close up of session.

Gist of 4th Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At’har

Gist of 2nd in series of topic, 4th Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At’har, 29 Nov, Moharram 2011, Masjid Iraniyan, Bombay, India

Topic: Injustice done to Prophet (saw) and his ancestors as well as progeny by biased Islamic history

As continued from yesterday, today the talk would be about injustice done with Prophet Mohammed (saw) by Islamic mohaddisaen (narrators). The people who were bribed by Banu Ommaya narrated follies in the name of Hadith to please their lords (Caliphs). Later philosophies and opinion were set up on these issues in following periods.

Mohaddis projected Mohammed’s (saw) family as kafir (disbeliever), why? The biggest reason is Banu Ommayya (Clan of Abu Sufyan) was bitter enemy of Banu Hashim (Clan of Mohammed (saw)) even before the birth of Prophet (saw). Peoples from Banu Ommaya opposed the Prophet (saw) for around 20 years openly and staunchly, finally, when Prophet (saw) entered Makka as a winner, just to save their lives Banu Ommayya people recited Kalma ( Declaration of faith), in their opinion Prophet (would have cut their heads). This would have been true had Prophet (saw) been a king, but no, he was a prophet. Kings rule the situations while prophets rule the conscience.

With the sword in one hand while the Quran in other Mohammed erected his throne on the ruins of Christianity and Rome! These are words of Edward Gibbon. He spoke thus about Islam. It was Gibbon’s opinion about Islam and Prophet (saw), why? The people who appeared to be muslim in eyes of Gibbon did had sword in one hand. Prophet (saw) had given two things as his legacy Quran in one hand while Ahlul bayt (is family members) in the other. People who claimed muslims left Ahlul Bayt (as) and took swords in the other hand. I would say Gibbon you’re looking from Europe, rather, have a look from our view these people didn’t even had Quran in the other hand they just had stones in Juzdan (Cloth bag in which Quran is wrapped)!

We do take objection to this that ancestors of Prophet (saw) were disbelievers. Taqallum (alternations) is an Arabic word which in Quranic ayat (verse) implies to alternations of generations (father-son-father-son…). Allah says: O beloved we have made you taqallum among those who prostrate to Allah! Implies none from the ancestry were disbelievers, from Adam (as) to Abdullah (as) all were muslims. Even in Ziyarat that we recite we witness about the faith of his ancestors. In other verse Allah shed light that Prophet (saw) was raised among momineen (faithful). Anfusana (self) word is used to denote relation between those who resemble each other outwardly as well as inwardly. This same word is used in ayat Mobahila (imprecation) as well. To cite an example, if I had to get Quran kept in other corner of room packed with people, how do I get? Either a person would take Quran and bring it directly to me crossing people, or the first person would pass it to second and so on until it reaches me. It is obvious that those who pick the Quran would obviously be Ba Wazu (in state of ablution). When we mere muslims have this much respect that Quran should be handled in state of purity, how would God allow Prophet (saw) on whom Quran would decend to be son of disbelievers? These mohadisen wrote Prophet (saw) was just like them equal to them, but we believe he was Noor (Spiritual illuminance).

All ancestor of Prophet (saw) were believers and not just common believer they possessed Wilayat (supremacy in eyes of Allah over other believers). Abdul Mutallib declared am being ordained about digging Zamzam well. Zamzam well when was re-dug by Abdul Mutallib (as) kafirs (disbelievers) objected citing the reason that it was disrespectful for their idols, had He been an idolators would he go to dug the wellwhen it was objectionable to idols? Rather he asked his tribesmen to get ready with weapon incase these people object further. Mohaddisen wrote when he was digging Kafireen assembled, well had he been kafir as well it would have been written ‘people’ assembled there, but since he was not like others word kafir is used for other, unknowingly by the same mohaddiseen. Amina (as) also recited verses which correspond to verses of Quran at time of Prophet’s (saw) birth, implies all were momineen. Mohaddisen didn’t enter them, they inserted names of new muslims, it is obvious that only new people are listed, older who are already a part, doesn’t get enlisted, since they are already a part.

They may question, about they didn’t offered namaz, well they did, what system prevails today since the Prophet’s (saw) time was not practiced but there was an alternate valid system. There was namaz always in some or other form; even these people who ask us question themselves have different types of namaz depending on maslak they follow even today. Different namaz have different forms, daily prayers are different from Jumma, Eid prayers are different, janaza prayers are different, ayaat prayers are different so the issue should not be was it there or not. It was only the form was different. Jafar Tayyar (as) declared he never worshipped any idols nor ever sipped alcohol even during the days of ignorance.

They object with us, saying Quran says Allah sent an Ummi (Uneducated) prophet among themselves. Well, we believe since Makka is known as Ummul Qura as well, Allah referred Prophet (as) as it citizen by calling him Ummi. They further object that even the word minhum (from among) is used. Well, we would say yes Makkan were uneducated a majority of them were thus, so Allah from this viewpoint states he raised from among them who were uneducated but Prophet (saw) was educated among these uneducated. The reason is they didn’t saw Prophet (saw) with paper and pen, they thought he was uneducated. Well, who did taught Prophet (saw)? Since, Allah was his teacher he didn’t had any worldly teacher.

If literal point is taken a person who masters in literature of some language, two people without any reason gains popularity because of them, the one is his teacher the other his student. That this person is teacher of so and so or this person is student of so and so. Look in this light Teacher of Prophet (saw) is Allah while the student of Prophet (saw) is Ali (as). Can anyone doubt about the knowledge of Ali (as) even the people who didn’t believed in his imamat or even his staunchest enemies had to agree about his knowledge. Who taught Ali (as) so he gained knowledge, no one ever tried to take credit, did any? Ali (as) on two occasions said Prophet (saw) taught him. On one occasion he said that Prophet (saw) opened for him thousand doors of knowledge and he further opened thousand from each. Doesn’t this show that Prophet (saw) himself was educated? On second occasion Ali (as) said that Prophet (saw) gave him knowledge just as birds feed in its babies in the nest from mouth to mouth.

If you ask them that do you have any document of any person from the time of Prophet (saw)? The document should be from time of Prophet (saw) while it should be present even today? We have Quran, but that is word of Allah. Secondly, we have Hadith those are words of Prophet (saw), the only other document which we have is Nahjul Balagha (Peak of eloquence) which is credited to Ali (as), his interpretation of Quran. Now we have three documents, Quran word of Allah, Ahaadith words of Prophet (saw), Nahjul Balagha words of Ali (as). If at this moment I feel to recite Kalima, how should I do that? Shouldn’t it be like this: There is no god but Allah; Mohammed (saw) is messenger of Allah, Ali (as) is Waliallah (superiority over other believers in eyes of Allah)!

There after Habib’s bin Mazaher (as) receiving the letter of Imam Husain (as) to join him and cascading events were informed. Masaaib were followed as climax of Majlis.

Gist of 3rd Majlis by Maulana Mohammed At’har

Gist of 1^st in series of topic, 3rd Majlis by Maulana Mirza Mohammed At’har, 28 Nov, Moharram 2011, Iraniyan Masjid, Bombay, India

Topic: Injustice done to Prophet (saw) and his ancestors as well as progeny by biased Islamic history.

Islamic society had done injustice with family of Prophet (saw), his ancestors as well with his progeny. We would in concluding majaalis ponder over about the issue in a manner like a sort of investigations.

People accuse shia of exhuming the dead and buried issues even after 1400 year, may be to spread disintegration among muslim. Well, rather than disintegration it’s a demarcation about truth and evil. Unless people don’t know truth and evil they mix the two, by bringing up the issue we rather try to bring up truth. In an environment which was terrible for us we may have gone silent or hidden but in this secular environment, what’s wrong to bring up our issue and use our freedom of expression?

The mohaddith ( narrators) who were on stipends of tyrant Banu Ommayya wrote hadiths under their pleasures and according to their wishes. Greek court recently reopened the issue about the illegitimate death sentence on Socrates after 2500 year, he was asked to declare King's opinion to be true or drink the cup of poison, he did the latter, just to separate truth from falsehood. Similar case is being going through Pakistan judiciary about the death sentence of Z A Bhutto, accused is dead, but the people who support Z A Bhutto want truth to prevail. Implies it’s all about who people support, when we shia raise the issue which are 1400 years old we actually show our support for Husain (as).

Islamic history did injustice with two famous people of Islamic history the first being Abu Talib (as) and second being Khadija (as). Abu Talib (as) is accused of being idolatory and Khadija’s (as) age falsely stated. Abu Talib (as) is told as both a Kafir as well as protector of Prophet (saw) both at same time. Because of the second topic the protection granted to Prophet (saw) Allah would decrease his punishment in Hell to such a limit at just his brain would be boiling like food being cooked, hilarious! This is what majority of muslims believe is the due paid to Abu Talib (as) for protecting Prophet (saw), disgusting! If someone says his grown up children don’t listen to him, that can be understood, but if someone say his tiny children don’t listen to him, that's unbelievable. It implies fault in them. Ali (as) son of Abu Talib declared to believe in Mohammed (as) at age of 12 or 13 and Abu Talib (as) stood by him, why didn’t a kafir Abu Talib (as) stopped his 12 year old son from becoming a believer? This accusation is for a reason the Banu Ommayya knew the crimes of their forefather could never be wiped out, so rather than trying to wipe those out, it would be better to blame others with same crimes, this would bring the two on same level.

Second, injustice done is with Khadija (as) about her age, that Prophet (saw) married a lady of 40 years, why didn’t ladies of Prophet’s (saw) house stopped him from marrying an old lady? Sunni Hadith Sabaqat Ibn Sa’ad mentions that Prophet (saw) was born in year of Elephant, same book mention Khadija (as) was born 3 years before year of Elephant, implies she was just 3 years older than Prophet (saw). The reason why Khadija (as) didn’t married other when although proposals were being sent to her is because she was on same religion as was Mohammed (saw).

To conclude from history of so called mohhadisaen two people are kafir (disbeliever) and two are momin ( faithful). Abu Sufyan and Yazid are momin. Abu Talib (as) and Shia are Kafir. The people who fight with Prophet (saw) and His grandson (as) are Momin and the person who supported Prophet (saw) and those who mourn the painful martyrdom of his grandson (as) to this day are kafir. Well, it’s ok, may on the day of judgement we be there where Abu Talib (as) is and these be there were Abu Sufyan be.

Abu Talib (as) supported Islam with his influence while Khadija (as) supported Islam with her money. When Prophet (saw) would come home having sadness on his face, Khadija (as) would ask what happened? Prophet (saw) would reply my people are hungry, Khadija (as) would respond take my money and feed them. Glory! She became mother she fulfilled her duty as mother. The lady with whom Prophet (saw) spent 25 years has but few pages in history while those ladies who spent few years with Prophet (saw) have book over book written for them. Her age is increased in hadith implies maybe it was taken from someone’s else age and added to Khadija’s (as) while the other’s age was decreased!

People may ask how much did Khadija (as) spent, look Makka was not very prosperous, and how much she had to spend? What was influence of Abu Talib (as) population of Makka was low, the best reply to such questions is whenever a muslim walks with his religious prestige it’s because of influence of Abu Talib (as) and whatever Muslim eats is because of money of Khadija (as).

When both Abu Talib (as) and Khadija (as) passed away in few month one after other, it was at this point that Allah asked him to migrate out of Makka. Prophet (saw) called it year of sadness, they say mourn for 3 days over dead. Was Allah who raised Moses (as) in pharoah’s palace so weak who can’t protect Mohammed (saw) in Makka? No, but it was to show that the influence which protected Mohammed (saw) was of Abu Talib's (as) while the money which helped Islam was of Khadija's (as). Otherwise people would have said: he stayed in Makka even after the death of Abu Talib (as), implies someone else gave protection and someone else' money was used. Allah by his order certified the value of Abu Talib (as) and Khadija (as).

Abu Talib (as) just didn’t gave his influence he left influence and gave Islam his son Ali (as) to continue the influence. Same with Khadija (as), she also gave birth to a daughter Fatima (as) as her legacy. Allah unified the two sources by asking Prophet (saw) to marry Fatima (as) with Ali (as).

When influence of all the prophets (as) concentrated it became influence of Prophet (saw), when influence of Prophet (saw) concentrated it became jihad of Husain (as).

Masaaibs were followed later at the end of Majlis.

Moharram 2011

Moharram the Islamic year has just begin, but rather than festivity its full of mourning, as Prophet's beloved grandson (saw) Imam Husain (as) was mercilessly butchered along with other 71 members of his family and friend circle. These martyrs did include even 6 month old baby Ali Asghar (as) who was pierced by a poisonous arrow on his throat. Head of 72 martyrs we cut and put on spears, ladies were taken captives they were paraded from market to market, court to court shamlessly handcuffed, neck tied to rope and without their outer covering ( Hijab), finally taken to tyrant Ommayad caliph Yazid. The people who killed the these 72 person claimed they were Muslim and were doing holy war ( Islamic duty), this shows Islam and Holy Prophet's (saw) family itself were the first victims of these terorrism which is termed as holy war.
It all started with Yazid asking allegience ( Bayah) from Husain (as) grandson of Prophet (saw) to run is illegitimate caliphate, and whatever evil he would do would on account of allegience of Husain (as) be certified by Husain (as). Imam Husain (saw) chose to sacrifice his life and give his family and friends for the sake of Islam and upto the last day made it sure that Prophet's (saw) Islam was different from duplicate Caliphate based Islam which promoted terrorism.
Imam Husain's (as) eternal sacrifice would ever be remembered by all, he asked his lover before laying his life: Hal Min Nasirin Yansurna ( Would would join me in my cause). Reply to it by saying: Labaik Ya Husain (as) ( I am ready to help your cause O Husain (as))

Mahatma Gandhi  once declared; if ever I too had 72 people like those who were in camp of Husain (as) I would have won freedom for India in less than 24 hours.
He also said: If ever India desires to be a successful country it should follow the principles of Imam Husain (as).
He also said: I learnt from Husain (as) how to won even after being oppressed.

Like others, Anna too has had his days

I've been against him right from the moment he started his mission and his activities about his jan lok pal. I feel hapy that slowly slowy his concepts and opinion are becoming evident as to how much value they imbibe in them and how much welfare those methods can bring up. As discussed previously about Anna's method to deal with alcoholics, tieing them to trees and flogging them is illegal and a crime. Anna should be booked under various sections of IPC, CRPC, BPA etc. Law allows to manufacture alcohol, law allow to consume alcohol, who is Anna to go to such limits in practising his self made rules? If any alcoholic does misbehave that case should be taken to police and an official complaint be launched, its duty of police they have right to deal in such matters Anna doesn't have any right. To held guily and to punish is responsiblity of court, Anna can't punish, such actions are contempt of judicial system. Now, he say he used to do it back about 25 years, and those people have said it was good for them. This is just because they fear further illegal torture by Anna and his team that they declare such statement. He wants to become second Gandhi, first Gandhi was so non-voilent this duplicate Gandhi is so voilent. His real motive was publicity which Gandhiji enjoys in our country and not social issue. This is why he is busy in making his wax statue rather than campaigning.
He say it all happened long back 25 year is not long back if our laws are considered IPC itself came into being in 1869 so Anna has no excuse, as even 25 years back IPC was there as Penal law.
People should concentrate on legal way which are in accordance with our supreme consitituion and not in whims and fancies of Anna and his brainless team, which has no care for law of land.
He talks about removign corruption in India, can't even manage core committee, they themsleves are having dispute he can't resolve and he accuses Govt. of not trying to resolve issue which include whole parliament and legislative assemblies of whole India and all the states, just look how difficult it is to deal with such issue. If Anna can't deal with his tiny team, salute the govt. it is talking into confidence of all representatives from so many contituencies.
I hope slowly slowy this Anna fever will vanish away. Sane people who respect the law of land ignore him, in the mean time Anna should be reffered to some psychiatrist on govt. expenses. My previous comments on him:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.215825958462071.66353.100001040046136&type=3#!/photo.php?fbid=263024750408858&set=a.215825958462071.66353.100001040046136&type=3&theater

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.215825958462071.66353.100001040046136&type=3#!/photo.php?fbid=263024750408858&set=a.215825958462071.66353.100001040046136&type=3&theater

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.215825958462071.66353.100001040046136&type=3#!/photo.php?fbid=2181971803283&set=t.100001040046136&type=3&theater

Eid Mubahila ( 24 Dhul Hajja)

Mubahila ( imprecation) is an event towards the end of ninth year, Prophet (saw) sent his official letters of office of prophethood to tribes around. One such letter was send to Bishop of Najran, Yemen, it concluded in invitation to Islam or exercise religious freedom under Islamic government.

The Bishop send 14 members as representative to Madina to discuss the issue with Prophet (saw), the deputation was headed by Abdul Masih Aaquib, Abdul Haris ibn Alqama and Saiyed. The discussed the issue with Prophet (saw) who invited them to Islam as truthful messenger from same God who sent Jesus (as) aforetime for guidance, in case they dont accept Islam they have to accept the conditions of exercise of religious freedom in accordance to Islamic rules ( payment of Jizya).

They began to inquire from Prophet (saw) about his belief in Jesus (as), about what Islam says about Jesus (as). They were not convinced with reply of Jesus (as) not being son of God rather just be messenger and prophet of God.

As counter question, the representatives put question about who the father of Jesus (as) was? Since they too knew Islam believes in virgin and miraculous conception of Mary (as). They put this question deliberately to get reply 'no one', thus they can conclude that if no one fathered Jesus (as) implies that he was son of God.

God revealed the following verse of Qur'an as a reply for them, which would put stop to their counter questions:

[Quran 3:59] Inna ma-sala Isa inda Allah kama-sali Aadama khalqahu min turabinn summa qala lahu kun fayakun
Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allah is like that of Adam. He created Him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was.
[Quran 3:60] Alhaqqu min Rabbika fala takun min almumtarin
The truth is from your Lord, so do not be among the doubters.

Thus, this bought an end to their counter question, they wanted to imply that since Jesus (as) had no father would imply he was son of God. God replied in eyes of God, Jesus (as) was in likeness of Adam (as). If they go by their beliefs than Adam (as) had greater right to be son of God since he had niehter father nor mother.

This too could not convince them. Lately, the following verse was revealed to Prophet (saw) as last option possible:

[Qur'an 3:61] Faman haajjaka fihi mim ba'di majaa'aka min alilmi faqul ta'aalu nadu abna'ana wa abna'akum wa nisa'ana wa nisa'akum wa anfusana wa anfusakum summa nabtahil fanajal la'anat Allahi ala alkazibin!

Then whoever (Christians of Najran, Yemen) argues with you (Prophet Mohammed) about it after [this] knowledge has come to you - say, "Come, let us call our sons (Imam Hasan and Imam Husain) and your sons, our women (Fatima Zahra) and your women, ourselves ( Prophet Mohammed and Imam Ali) and yourselves, then supplicate earnestly [together] and invoke the curse of Allah upon the liars [among us]."

They, were asked to assemble with their sons, women and selves and curse each other and if Prophet (saw) was liar there curse would fall on him and vice versa.

Note, herein Prophet (saw) had an option to take more then one woman, and more one who would be like him ( his self). He took just his daughter and cousin although there was an option but with condition. It implies that no one was equivalent to his self except Ali (as) though other had desires to be taken, also no other woman was competant enough except Fatima (as).

Once, the Christian deputation accepted the imprecation contest, Salman Farsi (ra) was asked to make arragement and a stage. On 24th Dhul Hajja 9th Hijri, Prophet (saw) bought them (the aforetold persons), the Christian deputations was awestruck and spellbound to see the illuminating personalities. They became sure enough that if these people utter curses against them they would perish away.

Abdul Haris ibn Alqama exclaimed: "Verily I see a divine light on the face of our combatants; I am beholding such faces among them as can make the mountains move from their spots if they pray to God. So beware! Never try to contest with them, otherwise you will perish and the entire nation of Christians will succumb to extinction!"

Later, they signed a treaty to live as Christians and exercise religious freedon within Islamic government in return for Islamic tax 'Jizya'.

Day of triumph, Eid Mubahila Mubarak!!! 

Eid Ghadeer ( 18th Dhul Hajja)

Background:
In the year of farewell Hajj just after Hajj, when Prophet (saw) was returning back to Madina, on his way to Madina at some distance away at Juhfa, Archangel Gabriel ( Jibril) bought down the following revealation of Quran to Prophet (saw):

[Qur'an 5: 67] Ya ayyuhar Rasulo balligh maa unzila ilayka mir Rabbik, wa i(n)l lam taf'al fama ballaghta risaalatahu. wa Allahu ya'simuka minan naas, innal Allaha la yahdil qaumal kaafiriin.

O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message. And Allah will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allah does not guide the disbelieving people.

After its revealation caravan entered the valley of Ghadeer khum near Madina, Ghadeer khum literally mean an oasis in archaic Arabic, thus the name. Here, afternnon prayers were offered Prophet (saw) asked people to make a pulpit near the oasis. Prophet (saw) delivered a heart touching speech and finally made Ali (as) to stand beside him. He asked people: did you know this man? They replied in boost: He is Ali son of Abu Talib. Prophet (saw) began saying thus: Allahu Maulaya wa anaa Maulatul Momin wa man kuntu Maulahu fahaza Aliyyun Maulahu that is Allah is my Maula, I am momin's Maula and to whom so ever I am Maula then Ali is his/ her Maula. He prayed in favour of Ali (as) and his supporters and stepped down from pulpit. Instantly, Umar bin Khattab ( later second Caliph) got up and congratulated Ali (as) and said: Greetings O son of Abu Talib this day you have been made commander of faithfuls ( Amirul Momniin).

Points to be remembered: Allah asked Prophet (saw) that if he didn't declared what was revealed it would imply he didn't convey any message of messengership of whole 23 years. It should be understood that now, if some one doesn't believe in this declaration it would imply he/ she didn't believed in any message from 23 years.

Just after this event got over Gabriel bought a momentous revealation of Qur'an, it forms the part of following verse:

[Qur'an 5:3] Alyauma akmaltu lakum diinakum wa atmamtu alaykum ni'mati wa raditu lakumul Islama diina

This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.

Eid Ghadeer Mubarak!!!

Children's day

Better than just distributing toffees to students it would be better to look into the issue revolving around children and try to ponder what exactly children need?
Children are future, they need nutrition, protection, education, care and most important a scope to develop. None of the necessities are met as they should be and ironically we expect growth of our nation in future which would definately be run by these very children. To be specific about education, its getting worst day by day.
Shameless vote bank politics and porous ethos results in idiotic education system, which in turn pressurises the scope and hamper the development of children.
Only those stuffs should be taught which develops child's overall personality in consideration with age. I can't understand why just to pacify political ethos education systems are modified? i.e. three to four languages are taught to children in school because x language has this status, y language has that status and z language has further this status.
Maths and science are not taught to make their aptitude grow rather they are taught to rote and practise. Without first letting them know the application and reasons for the same, theories and concepts are taught.
To make them competant is confused with making them tired.
Hope our outlook changes, but I feel first the same old mindset people who control education system be changed for some better and different ones.
Right to education should not be confused with school attendance!

11-11-11 ( 11:11) November sensation

Funny sensation going on around, everyone wants to run after 11-11-11 (11:11), do something memorable, how funny! It's just a number, if you look at it deeply its 11-11-2011, remember the year is 2011, the moment for which people are running for actually happened long back, it happened on 11-11-1111 AD (11:11). I dont feel there is any need to go mad about it. It Ok it you cherish the moment but there are other moments as well.

Astrology takes you no where same is Numerology they are just man made assumptions. Worst thing around C-sections. Atleast, don't go for C section and let babies take their time, no need to pull them. If parents seriously want to do something on that moment they can pray for the babies to be born or just relax.