Sunday 20 October 2013

World, come laugh on India, 1000 tonne gold!

Indian constitution, the Supreme law of India, has in its Article 51 A (h) as a fundamental duty: to develop Scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

Archeological Survey of India (ASI), which comes under Ministry of Culture of Government of India has started excavation at Unnao/ Dhaundia Kheda a village in Uttar Pradesh state of India, the amazing part is a ‘Sadhu’ a Hindu monk named Sobhan Sarkar saw in a dream the soul/ spirit of a 19th century king called Raja Ram Rao Bux Singh, the soul/ spirit of the king informed him that the nearby fort has 1000 tonne (1000000 kg) of gold buried at 12 feet below the fort’s temple.


No maps, no manuscripts just nothing, to be precise without any scientific temper; Archeological Survey of India started its excavation work to acquire 1000 tonne (1000000 kg) gold. ASI is run by men who are so called highly talented doctorate holders, Dr. this and Dr. that. World, just look what kind of study they possess, they work on basis of dreams of a Hindu monk, not on basis of archeology or science.

Ministers, including Chief Minister of State too stood with Hindu monk, and believed in the dream. The monk later said if they don’t dig according to his guidelines the gold will vanish away, later he said call Indian army to dig, is this scientific temper?

Indian media all channels went there to cover the story, the myth; Indian media tries to show it is highly intellectual and scientific tempered, their presence and coverage shows what mentality they as well have. There is just no 1000000 kg gold, it’s so stupid to believe in all this claims. Let them dig for 12 feet to reap the result of working on basis of Sadhu’s dreams. I would appreciate if the authorities are suspended for undertaking such stupidity. They have no ethical basis to sit on chair which need scientific tempered scholars, who are highly educated.

There would be some reason why India was called as ‘country of snake charmers’ by Britishers. And probably why we are still developing because our govt. agencies, ministers and bureaucrats posses such stupid mentalities to work on basis of dreams of monks.

Tuesday 15 October 2013

Word 'Allah' is not a Muslim monopoly, Malaysian court reconsider decree!

The Word 'Allah' is an Arabic term for God, since, Holy Qur'an was revealed in Arabic language it uses the term 'Allah' for God. Pre-Islamic Arabs who were Pagans, Jews and Christians used the term 'Allah' even before the proclamation of Islam. Even today Arabs who are either Jews or Christians use the term 'Allah' in their prayers and conversations. Holy Bible in Arabic language also uses the term 'Allah'. These conveys that word 'Allah' is not within Muslim monopoly.

In Holy Qur'an, Allah declares himself 'Rab ul Aalameen' that is 'Lord of all Universes/ Worlds', Allah also declares himself as 'Al Khaaliq' that is The Creator. So for a Muslim it is must to believe that Allah is the sole Creator of all; including those who don't follow Islam, and Allah is also Lord of all those who are not following Islam.

Now, if a person who doesn't follow Islam recognizes his Creator and refers Him as 'Allah', shouldn't Muslim be happy with that? Of course, Muslims or any Arab can take objection if word 'Allah' is used in an insulting manner, but if someone is using it with reverence, on what grounds can an objection be raised?

A Malaysian court has decreed that Non-Muslims can't use word 'Allah' as it creates confusion, Malaysian court should take reference that no court of law (or any human made institution) can assume its ownership on domains of Allah, that is His name, His religion etc. Because Allah is sole Owner of His Domains. Thus, Malaysian court should reconsider its decree in this regard.

Hebrew language also uses this term as 'Wallah' which is an Arabic origin term associated with word 'Allah'. Word 'Allah' is an Arabic term which Holy Qur'an also includes, but Muslims have no monopoly over it. Everyone regardless of religion and ethnicity are free to use the term, if they uses the term with reverence. Muslims should rather be happy with the increment in the usage.