US constitution guarantees it's citizens to bear arms, but it also guarantees it's citizens right to life! What if someone's right to bear arms is coming in conflict with other's right to Life? Which right must supercede the other; right to bear arm's for those who want to or right to life which is enjoyed by one and all?
The law allows you to bear arms but does it allow you to carry ammunition along with, I mean a fully loaded gun?
It was really painful to get the news of Connecticut's tragedy, I just feel the legislators should now come into action and legislate to clarify which right must supercede the other; right to bear arms should supersede the right to life, or the right to life must supercede the right to bear arms.
Slavery was prevalent once upon a time, but when conscience of humans advanced and they grasped that slavery hurts the right to freedom of slaves, which is Divine in nature, the world bought an end to slavery, now there is need to bring an end to any such possibility which devastate families and snatch away the loved ones.
The law allows you to bear arms but does it allow you to carry ammunition along with, I mean a fully loaded gun?
It was really painful to get the news of Connecticut's tragedy, I just feel the legislators should now come into action and legislate to clarify which right must supercede the other; right to bear arms should supersede the right to life, or the right to life must supercede the right to bear arms.
Slavery was prevalent once upon a time, but when conscience of humans advanced and they grasped that slavery hurts the right to freedom of slaves, which is Divine in nature, the world bought an end to slavery, now there is need to bring an end to any such possibility which devastate families and snatch away the loved ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment