India Of My Dreams: The stupidity of intra-city long bridges

India Of My Dreams: The stupidity of intra-city long bridges: We have been trying to combat traffic jams but are a failure, which implies our methods to control the traffic are absurd. Thus we need to...

Gantantra Diwas Ki Parade aur uska Kharch

Gantantra Diwas ki Parade aur uska Kharch

Agar hum Bharatiya Gantantra diwas ki parade ke viprit kuch bhi kehte hae, jisme achi khasi raqam kharch hoti hae jiska janta par bojh padta hae, hume kaha jata hae hum shradha nahi rakhte. Bharat ki sena ke balidano ke prati shadha nahi hae. Ye bilkul ghalat arop hae. Koi bhi aesa nahi hoga jo sena ke balidano ke prati shradha nahi rakhta hoga.

Balke, jab hum adhik kharcha karke is parade ka ayojan karte hae us samay hum unlogo ke prati sharadha nahi rakhte hae jinhe us pal zarurat hoti hae roti ki, dawao ki, haspatalo ki aur zaruri suwidhao ki sath hi zarurat hae infra-structure ki. Balke jab hum Bharat ke Sanvidhan ke margdarshan se hat jate hae us samay hume shardha nahi hoti.

Samvidhan ka mardarshan hume aage badhne ko prerit karta hae, is liye to sanvidhan ko nahi lagu kiya gaya tha taake parade par karodo kharch ho. Ye adhik acha hota ke hum apne desh ko uphar dete Gantanra Diwas ka hospatalo ke rup me, sadko ke rup me, bijli gharo ke rup me.

Gantantra diwas Sanvidhan ka diwas hae naake sirf sena ka, adhik dhyan hamare sanvidhani marg par dena chaiye.

Gantantra Diwas ki Shubkamnaye.

Indian Republic Day Parade and its expenses

If we Indians says anything against costly Republic day Parade, in which a hefty amount is burdened on public, we are labelled as insensitive. Insentivie towards the sacrifice of our soldiers. This is absolutely an absurd remark. No one is insensitive towards the sacrifices of our soldiers.

Rather, when we lavishly celebrate such occassion we are being insensitive to a lot of Indians who are in dire need of bread, medicines, hospitals, schools. Beyond that we are in dire need of infra-structure. Our efforts in providing necessary facilities and necessary infra-structure, would rather be being sensitive towards our goals as stated in Contitution of India.

Consitution wants us to go further in our goal, it was not adopted on 26 January so that we go on spending crores on parades. It would really be a better way to celebrate our republic day by giving our country gifts on republic day in form of hospitals, roads, power generation houses etc.

Republic day is day for Constitution and not solely about defense, we should concentrate more on our goals on this day.

Happy Republic Day.

Innovative Mazher: Control mosquitoes with 'Brecomb'

Innovative Mazher: Control mosquitoes with 'Brecomb': I was pondering over mosquito menace, and struck upon this new technique to control mosquito menace and make our environment more disease f...

Now, its Mulayam Singh v/s English in Parliament

Mulayam Singh Yadav a senior member of parliament of India has proposed to ban use of English in Parliament.

Well, Hindi has a lot of speakers in India but not all Indians speak Hindi. And if Hindi is enforced on them it creates a sense of insecurity in minds of Indians who don't speak Hindi. Likewise, any regional language also induces a sense of inconvenience to Hindi speakers, and they feel Hindi is being isolated.

I don't know why, but English doesn't create such sense of insecurity or inconvenience issue in minds of any Indian. English is taken as secular language and its empirically proven that only English does the job of unification in India. If English is isolated from mainstream in India no other language can earn goodwill which English has, thus they would result in insecurity, inconvenience which is just opposite of Indian ethos.

Constitution of India is written in English, English version is widely used, it is really absurd to say such a thing that English should be banned from Parliament. The member chooses his/her language and this is constitutional freedom.

If Mulayam Singh Yadav speaks in Hindi well and good, but if another member prefer English, constitutionally no one should have problem.

Putting ban on English in Parliament is unconstitutional and there is no such provision to be proposed or legislated.

World, come laugh on India, 1000 tonne gold!

Indian constitution, the Supreme law of India, has in its Article 51 A (h) as a fundamental duty: to develop Scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

Archeological Survey of India (ASI), which comes under Ministry of Culture of Government of India has started excavation at Unnao/ Dhaundia Kheda a village in Uttar Pradesh state of India, the amazing part is a ‘Sadhu’ a Hindu monk named Sobhan Sarkar saw in a dream the soul/ spirit of a 19th century king called Raja Ram Rao Bux Singh, the soul/ spirit of the king informed him that the nearby fort has 1000 tonne (1000000 kg) of gold buried at 12 feet below the fort’s temple.

No maps, no manuscripts just nothing, to be precise without any scientific temper; Archeological Survey of India started its excavation work to acquire 1000 tonne (1000000 kg) gold. ASI is run by men who are so called highly talented doctorate holders, Dr. this and Dr. that. World, just look what kind of study they possess, they work on basis of dreams of a Hindu monk, not on basis of archeology or science.

Ministers, including Chief Minister of State too stood with Hindu monk, and believed in the dream. The monk later said if they don’t dig according to his guidelines the gold will vanish away, later he said call Indian army to dig, is this scientific temper?

Indian media all channels went there to cover the story, the myth; Indian media tries to show it is highly intellectual and scientific tempered, their presence and coverage shows what mentality they as well have. There is just no 1000000 kg gold, it’s so stupid to believe in all this claims. Let them dig for 12 feet to reap the result of working on basis of Sadhu’s dreams. I would appreciate if the authorities are suspended for undertaking such stupidity. They have no ethical basis to sit on chair which need scientific tempered scholars, who are highly educated.

There would be some reason why India was called as ‘country of snake charmers’ by Britishers. And probably why we are still developing because our govt. agencies, ministers and bureaucrats posses such stupid mentalities to work on basis of dreams of monks.

Word 'Allah' is not a Muslim monopoly, Malaysian court reconsider decree!

The Word 'Allah' is an Arabic term for God, since, Holy Qur'an was revealed in Arabic language it uses the term 'Allah' for God. Pre-Islamic Arabs who were Pagans, Jews and Christians used the term 'Allah' even before the proclamation of Islam. Even today Arabs who are either Jews or Christians use the term 'Allah' in their prayers and conversations. Holy Bible in Arabic language also uses the term 'Allah'. These conveys that word 'Allah' is not within Muslim monopoly.

In Holy Qur'an, Allah declares himself 'Rab ul Aalameen' that is 'Lord of all Universes/ Worlds', Allah also declares himself as 'Al Khaaliq' that is The Creator. So for a Muslim it is must to believe that Allah is the sole Creator of all; including those who don't follow Islam, and Allah is also Lord of all those who are not following Islam.

Now, if a person who doesn't follow Islam recognizes his Creator and refers Him as 'Allah', shouldn't Muslim be happy with that? Of course, Muslims or any Arab can take objection if word 'Allah' is used in an insulting manner, but if someone is using it with reverence, on what grounds can an objection be raised?

A Malaysian court has decreed that Non-Muslims can't use word 'Allah' as it creates confusion, Malaysian court should take reference that no court of law (or any human made institution) can assume its ownership on domains of Allah, that is His name, His religion etc. Because Allah is sole Owner of His Domains. Thus, Malaysian court should reconsider its decree in this regard.

Hebrew language also uses this term as 'Wallah' which is an Arabic origin term associated with word 'Allah'. Word 'Allah' is an Arabic term which Holy Qur'an also includes, but Muslims have no monopoly over it. Everyone regardless of religion and ethnicity are free to use the term, if they uses the term with reverence. Muslims should rather be happy with the increment in the usage.