UPSC/CSAT and politics of PM Modi's government

The problem which PM Narendra Modi’s government addressed is absurd; next, some people will say we don’t know proper agriculture and farming because we are urban so remove agricultural questions from UPSC paper.

The Hindi issue is actually brain child of people like Rajnath Singh, who are expert in playing language politics, now they themselves are in mess to solve the problem which is their very own creation.

Hindi cannot bridge the gap with South India, only English could bridge the gap between North and South India. No South Indians or other Non-Hindi speakers should suffer the Hindi imposition.

Narendra Modi, Rajnath Singh and their BJP/NDA government is supplying fuel to fire of language politics, slowly slowly they will cut tongues of South Indians with their Hindi scissors.

BJP/NDA will try clarify that Narendra Modi himself is a Gujarati speaker yet promotes Hindi for nationalist causes, this is wrong. Gujarati speakers easily understand Hindi, Gujarati and Hindi are mutually tangible so such claims in favour of Modi are blatant lies. Tamil for example is not as tangible with Hindi as Gujarati is.

Hindi is not bad and no language is bad, language politics is bad, and to impose one’s language on others is bad. South Indians and all Non-Hindi speakers should stand against this language politics.

However, I would like to suggest Govt. in the interest of UPSC candidates in another blog of mine:  
Solution for UPSC/CSAT’s Hindi problem
UPSC/ CSAT ki Hindi samasya ka samadhan

Euthanasia (Allowed To Die) In India

It is so sensitive issue that nothing would prevent it from being called an intended murder even if minor (micro, nano) error in medical or psychological understandings and considerations occur. A life thus ended could never be bought back, who would carry the responsibility of that minute error resulting in death of the concerned person?

In India, nothing would follow it but exhumation, autopsy and closed files, these would be more of indignity for the deceased. Who can deny the possibility of organ transplant scam in the name of euthanasia? This question if put in India would prove to be a direct disaster on the very first human right ‘life’. The very word ‘life’ would literally be euthanized in that debate in India.

India has retained its sovereignty even after so many years, what about our reach in the field of medical science and medical research after so many years of sovereignty? Is Sovereignty the only parameter required to take into consideration the issue of euthanasia in India?

Let’s analyse, how much India has contributed in the field of medical science, medical research, anatomy, surgery, drugs, psychology, since independence, since our sovereignty? With what maturity India stands in the world today in field of medical science and research? What is quota for medical science and research in our annual union budget 2014 and individual state budgets? Where does this quota stand in comparison to the quota allotted for medical field in countries where euthanasia is allowed?

People talk about right to die with dignity in India. Rather, the question should be whether prior to dying with dignity, was there anything about living with dignity in India? Millions and millions of Indians live below poverty line, under extreme poverty. Million of Indians starve to death, millions of Indians have no access to drinking water, and millions of Indians go without food on daily basis. Millions of infants die in a couple of year since birth; millions of mothers die of childbirths.

Millions of Indians are extremely malnourished. Millions of Indians die due to extreme weathers. Millions of Indians have no place to call home. Millions of Indians sleep under open sky on footpaths in the night. Millions of Indians live in most un-hygienic environment. Millions of Indians are exposed to deadly pollution; millions are exposed to various carcinogenic factors due to radiations, water, air and sound pollutions.

Millions of Indians don’t know how to read and write, millions of Indians toil all day, sweating under scorching sun to earn two loaves of breads. Millions of Indian and millions of Indian children beg on streets, they beg, beg and beg, they beg in front of European and American tourists, around a monument, any place where foreigners could be found.

Millions of Indian girls are forced into trafficking, into prostitution. Millions of Indians girls are raped, assaulted, molested, gang-raped. Millions are murdered or left to die of wounds and trauma. Due to trafficking and rapes, millions of Indian girls are exposed to deadly disease ‘AIDS’, they would obviously want to die with dignity what about the indignity they faced in life?

Millions of cognizable criminal cases go un-registered; even if they are bought to notice of Indian police. Murdered in the name of encounters by police is not a new thing to hear in India. Millions of Indians are decaying in Indian jails since years, years over years, because of slow judicial trials.

Millions of villages are without hospitals, electricity, elementary schools, and primary schools, forget about colleges and universities. Millions of Indians suffer due to absurd dictats of ‘Khap Panchayats’, millions of Indians are murdered in the name of ‘honour killings’. Millions of Indians die in rail accidents, many in road accidents due un-maintained roads and railways.

India is still under need of medical facilities, proper drug supply. Millions of Indian can’t afford life saving drugs because of costs. India is in dire need of hospitals. India has a terrific shortage of medical colleges, and trained doctors, on the other hands medical seats are sold. We have a lot of scams of fake medical degree being granted on payment. This is where we stand with our bejewelled intact crown of sovereignty.

If this is the situation after so many years of sovereignty, we must conclude that Indian governments in all forms have failed to serve our citizens.

Today, Indian first need, a right to live a life with dignity. A person, who has received death blows all his life due to various national systems and procedures, and due to inefficiency of governments in various stages of his life, would definitely ask for death with dignity. But this death with dignity is not because of love of evident death, but because of frustration of indignity of life the person has lived because of inefficiency of governments.

Who would answer if Indians are made to live with dignity, how many Indians would ask for a death with dignity (euthanasia). An irrevocable patient may have been irrevocable because lack of medical aid during his entire life, may be because of police inefficiency in saving his life, may be because the patient was raped and assaulted due to inefficient system. May be so because he received nothing but dates in legal struggle of his life, this 'may be' has no limits, but the reasons are our government, official and constitutional agencies in no matter what form. The system pushes the citizen where he begins to ask for death with dignity.

To conclude, we may be sovereign enough to legislate on the issue of Euthanasia in India, but our Parliament and State Assemblies are not mature enough to even comprehend the gravity of euthanasia. Today, if euthanasia is legalised in India, it would mean just an official genocide, genocide of poor, genocide of unfortunate Indians who never ever practically tasted or experienced the fruits of our Constitution.

I salute Supreme Court's verdict on Shariat Court

Hon. Supreme Court today gave verdict regarding Darul Qad'at or Darul Itfa or Shariat courts. It is an awesome judgement.

There can never be a parallel judiciary in a country like India, and Mufti as they are called have no official rights to give binding judgement on almost everything. Most of the time their fatwe are so stupid (ie: UP rape case) that these Mufti should be bought in court for defamation suits against them.

I salute the Hon. Supreme Court's for this judgement that Shariat Court is not a legal identity or parallel judiciary in India. That Mufti should not give fatwa to the third party who dont seek their fatwa. And that a Fatwa is not binding upon anyone its a mere opinion in India. If need arise Hon. Supreme Court too can take Holy Qur'an into consideration where need arise, and I am petty sure that consideration would be much better than these Mufti.

I look forward that this judgement would change ground reality and would result in positive outlook and positive change for crores of Muslims in India.

Authoritarian aims of Narendra Modi

It is so simple to understand PM Narendra Modi wants to rule in an authoritarian manner. The way he isolated all senior BJP leaders on pretext of age was a glimpse.

Now, he's with lame excuses trying best not to appoint Leader of Opposition, Narendra Modi talks about clarity and he himself want that post which is core of clarity not to be appointed, its an irony. Only that person who wants to be authoritarian would behave as he's doing.

Our Speaker (Who should be very neutral) if she wants a just government she should instantly appoint Leader of opposition. Our times are different from Nehru era, we are largest democracy which requires LOP. Even if one MP from Lok Sabha forms opposition and all others are from ruling party, that one person should be instantly appointed as LOP. Even if all members are from ruling party an LOP should be appointed in Lok Sabha.

Having no LOP in Lok Sabha is harmful to our democratic make-up, if Narendra Modi's government is so clean and clear then why to fear appointment of LOP? Things are fishy and the solution is appointment of LOP in Lok Sabha.

Irresponsible Election Commission Of India

Election Commission of India is responsible for conducting free and fair election in India. Adult Franchisee, Universal Suffrage is recognised and all people above 18 years of age can cast their vote. Is it a reality in India?

Parliamentary election 2014 is under process and it’s sad to know how irresponsible and inefficient our Election Commission is, in conducting free and fair election. It is duty of Commission to update voter's list. It has five year’s slot to update voter's list, this commission runs under so called capable guidance of Mr V S Sampath Election Commissioner; could not even get passing grade from practical point of view, why so it’s as follow:

1) People who voted during the last election don’t find their names in voter's list and could not vote for Parliamentary Election, though they have Election Card, they were not allowed to vote. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India is this free and fair election?

2) There is just no co-ordinance between Election Commission of India and Municipalities, dead people are on current voter list, while many eligible living people are barred from voting which is their right, Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you have such sound mind that you expect dead to come out of graves to cast their votes?

3) Our Election Commission has ashamed even Kumbh Karan ( A demon in Epic Ramayana, who sleeps for six months), Commission sleeps for 4 years and six month and awakes six months prior to election and ask people who crossed 18 years to enlist themselves to voter's list, the process and executives are lethargic of highest grade. Majority of people who crossed 18 years could not enlist themselves for some or other technical reasons. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner is this free and fair election?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, do you think this way your leadership will pave way for our democratic government? Do you feel the government forming after declaration of results would be free, fair and justly elected government?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commisioner of India, what answers do you have for those voters who had cast their vote in last election and where not finding their names in your so called current voter's list and thus barred from voting?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, clarify what kind of computerisation and collaborations you have with municipalities that people who are long dead are invited by you to vote?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, we are a democracy it is when each and every eligible person voluntarily cast vote could we call it a democracy, people were heart broken when under your leadership they were barred from voting. When a large number of eligible people are barred from voting it’s not democracy it’s Oligocracy.

If Government changes a lot of people would smell a rat in the process, some alternate form of Gerrymandering, this time not with constituencies but with voter’s list, to isolate potential supporters of particular party from voting thus to influence the result. Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you have answers ready when possibly Media ask you this question?

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India, we know you’ll say it’s a hectic job to conduct election and some mishap occurs. But that is exactly what your job is all about, that is exactly you get hectic pay through public exchequer, has your pay or any of commission’s executives’ pay missed from exchequer’s list? If no than why voter’s names were missing? You’re Election Commissioner of India (1200000000 people country) and you are paid as per that, you are not election commissioner of San Marino or Luxembourg (minimal population).

Mr. V S Sampath Election Commissioner of India do you take responsibility for such occurrence where voter’s name were missing and thus barred from voting? What remedial measure you have for those who were barred from voting? How would you compensate the loss of their say (vote) in formation of government?

I would say, just as yours and your executives’ names never goes missing from exchequer’s list and as you take full pay give your full output, full output that you reach even the last eligible voter, else it’s never democracy, secondly you are put up at the position exactly for that; to conduct election in 120 crore people country.

As you say of computerisation prove it practically and collaborate with municipalities to remove names of dead people. Find death rate of India, and assure that that many number of people are removed from voter’s list. Find maturity rate of India and assure that that many new voter are enlisted, keep the voter’s list updated, that your primary job.

Don’t become active just six months prior to election, work for whole five years and practically prove it.

Do something for those who missed their right to vote; because without them no matter whichever government is formed that is not democratic, it would be oligocratic. Constitution defines India as a Democracy and not as Oligocracy.

Mr. V S Sampath your leadership has mocked our democracy and whole world know it.

Muslim Clerics, BJP and Indian Muslim Personal Law

Some of Shia and Sunni clerics are openly supporting BJP and its PM candidate Narendra Modi. The double standard of these Shia and Sunni clerics is worth to note.

Most of these Shia and Sunni clerics have seats and memberships of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, and they exercise all due privilages. Being members of All India Muslim Personal Law Board they are clearly in favour of Muslim Personal Law in India.

Also, BJP manifesto clearly states that when it comes to power and makes Narendra Modi the PM, they will abolish religious personal laws and thereby bring Uniform Civil Code.

If these Muslim Clerics are members of All India Muslim Personal Law Board which is based on the very principal of religious personal laws, then, how can these Muslim Clerics being a member of the board openly support BJP which clearly states in its manifesto that it will abolish personal laws to bring in Uniform Civil Code?

Muslims in India regardless of Shia and Sunni should first asks these clerics who support BJP to first resign from the post and membership of All India Muslim Personal Law Board and then and only then begin their support for BJP which is pro Uniform Civil Code.

A simple question for such double standard Shia and Sunni clerics of India, why are they trying to fool Indian Muslims in return of what so ever personal favours from BJP.

Congress (UPA) for India, 2014